Who cares which one sounds better. Dynamic range this, bandwidth that, blah blah.
What I need to know is: which one looks cooler under an electron microscope?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuCdsyCWmt8
(once again, I vote vinyl)
Over 18,000 spambot accounts successfully
T E R M I N A T E D
I have temporarily disabled registration due to the onslaught of spam.
If you would like to register, please contact upstairs through gearspace or realgearonline.
T E R M I N A T E D
I have temporarily disabled registration due to the onslaught of spam.
If you would like to register, please contact upstairs through gearspace or realgearonline.
Vinyl vs CD - settled?
Huh. I had never heard of the Capacitance Electronic Disc format. Pretty interesting concept.
I hadn't heard of that either, actually, but to be honest, I am not up on a lot of consumer video formats. I figured it was just one of those early digital formats that had a limited time frame, and just zoomed over my head/passed me by. Was it not popular? .... anyone ever have a player for those?
A bit before my time...
I was just reading about LaserDisc, and according to wikipedia at least, they could have analog tracks for the audio. This kinda bummed me out actually, as I was wondering about optical analog as a "futuristic" thing, but I guess it's already been tried.
I was just reading about LaserDisc, and according to wikipedia at least, they could have analog tracks for the audio. This kinda bummed me out actually, as I was wondering about optical analog as a "futuristic" thing, but I guess it's already been tried.
It wasn't analogue in the vinyl sense. It was similar to FM radio. There were two separate FM signals for the stereo channels.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests